Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • Due to the importance of gene regulation in

    2022-05-18

    Due to the importance of gene regulation in cancers, HDAC inhibitors have been studied extensively in cancer biology and are in current clinical use as anti-tumor therapies [17]. The HDAC inhibitors vorinostat, romidepsin, and belinostat have been approved for certain T-cell lymphomas, and panobinostat is approved for multiple myeloma; many more are in preclinical or phase II and III clinical trials (summarized in [18]). HDAC inhibitors have a range of effects on cancer cells including triggering apoptosis, autophagy, immune responses, DNA repair genes, signaling pathways, Entrectinib arrest, antiangiogenic effects, and more. This indicates that HDACs govern a program of responses instead of a specific, discrete cellular pathway [18]. Histone acetylation has also been studied in the heart due to its important role in cell survival. In mouse hearts subjected to I/R (ischemia 45 min and reperfusion 48 h), left ventricular HDAC activity nearly doubles [19]. No significant changes in HAT activity were observed [19]. Similarly, hypoxia induces HDAC activity in cultured neonatal mouse ventricular myocytes without affecting HAT activity [19]. Thus, it seems that HAT activity is not regulated during cardiac I/R. The most extensively studied HATs in muscle are p300 and the closely related coactivator, CREB-binding protein (CBP), enzymes that play critical roles in physiological and pathological growth of cardiac myocytes [20]. Recently, it was reported that rat hearts exposed to diabetic stress manifest increased HDAC activity at baseline and are more vulnerable to myocardial I/R injury compared with nondiabetic hearts. I/R injury further increased HDAC activity in diabetic rat hearts [21]. There are multiple HDAC isoforms in the heart responsible for reversing protein acetylation. Trichostatin A (TSA), an HDAC inhibitor specific to class I and class II HDACs, has been tested to determine whether it can reduce I/R injury. Du and colleagues have found that TSA treatment significantly reduces cardiomyocyte HDAC4 activity in the setting of I/R [22]. Further work by the same group revealed that cardiomyocyte-specific over-expression of a constitutively active HDAC4 (a His-976-Tyr mutation yielded an enzyme with a catalytic efficiency 1,000-fold higher than wild-type [23]) promotes larger infarct size [24]. Delivery of a chemical HDAC inhibitor attenuated the detrimental effects of active HDAC4 in I/R injury, revealing a pivotal role of active HDAC4 in response to myocardial I/R injury [24]. These results suggest that I/R injury derives at least in part from increased HDAC activity and subsequent relative de-acetylation of histones and proteins involved in a wide range of events.
    HDAC inhibition reduces infarct size in preclinical studies I/R-associated increases in HDAC activity raise the prospect of HDAC inhibition as a potentially meaningful therapeutic target in I/R injury. Zhao and colleagues tested TSA in isolated mouse hearts exposed to I/R stress. Pretreatment of these hearts with TSA for 15 min (preconditioning) or 24 h (delayed pharmacologic preconditioning) markedly improved recovery of ventricular function and reduced infarct size [25]. Granger and colleagues tested multiple HDAC inhibitors, including Scriptaid and TSA in an in vivo model of I/R injury in mice. They demonstrated that chemical HDAC inhibitors reduced infarct size significantly, even when delivered one hour after the ischemic insult [19]. These data lend support to the concept of HDAC inhibition as a viable therapeutic agent, as it reduces infarct size even when structurally distinct inhibitors are administered at the time of reperfusion. In 2006, the HDAC inhibitor, vorinostat (Zolinza®, Merck) also known as suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA), was approved for human use in the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Structurally, TSA and SAHA are very similar [26,27]. This opened the possibility of a clinical trial with a pharmaceutical grade compound. To pursue this, we first verified that SAHA reduces infarct size in mice when delivered at the time of reperfusion [26]. Next, we tested SAHA in a large animal (rabbit) I/R model [26]. Experiments were carried out in a blinded fashion with experimental rigor comparable to that used in a human clinical trial. Rabbits were randomized into three groups: vehicle control, SAHA pretreatment (one day prior and at surgery), and SAHA treatment only at the time of reperfusion. Each arm was subjected to I/R surgery. SAHA reduced infarct size robustly (around 40%) and partially rescued systolic function; importantly, the benefits observed were similar when drug was administered either before surgery (pretreatment) or exclusively at the time of reperfusion [26]. We also measured serum concentrations in rabbits to ensure that levels similar to those achieved in humans were seen. Of note, SAHA is the only FDA-approved HDAC inhibitor tested in a large animal model, an FDA pre-requisite to proceed to a first-in-human clinical trial. The protective effects of SAHA in a murine cardiac I/R model have also been verified in multiple, independent labs including the Menick lab [28] and the lab of one of the authors (M.X., unpublished data). These studies, then, lend strong support to the notion of pursuing pharmacological HDAC inhibition in I/R injury in patients (Fig. 1).